Showing posts with label united kingdom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label united kingdom. Show all posts

Tuesday, 15 August 2017

A day in the life of a GP

Following a recent "Day in the Life of..." article for The Guardian, their editors asked for other GPs to write to them about a typical day. I'm not aware that they have used mine, but as I wrote it, I thought I would share.

For context, I work in a medium to large sized GP practice in the North West of England, in a fairly deprived area. However, the set up of my practice is pretty good, and compared to local colleagues, I think we have it pretty good!

GP Life

One of the things I find hardest is that you have to remind yourself so often that you are in fact doing a good job. 

The very nature of patients is that they come to see me when they aren't well, or at least if they "consider themselves to be unwell" which is the description given to my potential client-base in the GMS contract; the contract that defines what GPs should do. 
This means they aren't their usual selves and often take their frustrations with the NHS, Social Care, or just life in general out on you. Even though I have nothing to do with these things, I have to try and and empathise with say, how poorly they perceive the communication about their care by my hospital colleagues; their dislike of the below-minimum wage home care assistant to do everything they want; or that their employer won't give them time off for their child's funeral.


I find people of my own generation (I'm 33) tough to deal with because their expectations are wildly unrealistic. They perceive any illness as abnormal, and often a failure of me  as a doctor to somehow prevent. The notion that any treatment I can provide might take more than one dose to fix is unacceptable to some. The human body ages and things don't work as well as it gets older. Unfortunately, it's not like a lease car that you can replace with a new model every 3 years - you're stuck with it and that sometimes means living with a condition.


Then again, the older generation are some of the most entitled. The number of times I am asked to visit someone at home, purely for their convenience, rather than an inability to come to the clinic, where all my kit and their usually extensive notes are. It's not uncommon for us to be asked to schedule our visits around, "when they are out"... it's a stark reminder of how unvalued I am as a professional that the hairdresser  appointment warrants a taxi but I don't. I'm frequently told that GPs used to visit their parents all the time when they were sixty years old, to stop and have a chat or whatever. They forget that the average life expectancy is way higher now, and there simply isn't the time to socialise anymore. 
It's sad, because I enjoy that, but whilst the patient only has to think of themselves, I am potentially thinking about 10000 other registered patients at our practice, any of whom might be needing me more urgently. Sme of the older generation seem oblivious to the fact that their visit takes at least 3 times as long as a standard appointment, and is usually done instead of my midday meal.


Children are another difficulty. I despair at "awareness" campaigns on TV and on Facebook, because I know they will lead to increasing numbers of requests for emergency appointments to review children for rare conditions they don't have. Whereas grandmothers and groups of mum friends would previously mutually reassure each other, now they spread panic. I disagree with the old adage "You can't be too careful"... I think we are now at a stage of such learned helplessness that the future of publicly funded healthcare is no longer viable in its current form. The NHS simply wasn't geared up for and is certainly not funded to see children every other week "in case their cold becomes meningitis". What happened to the family structure and trusting ones own instincts? 
It's rare I see a parent who hasn't been terrified by one campaign or another into doubting themselves and wanting a second opinion from me.


As a GP I can't predict the future, and unfortunately some people will get serious illness whatever anyone does to try and prevent it. Society appears to think differently, and has zero tolerance for any drop below 100% functioning. 


I sometimes watch TV programmes like BBC1s Doctors or Ch5 Behind Closed Doors. The latter is quite good, but I still feel comes nowhere near portraying what it is like to be making potentially life changing decisions at 10 minute intervals or less. 
It's hard for patients to grasp that I can't  "just have a quick look" because what they actually want is for me to reassure them that they don't have something serious. GPs don't possess magic powers, and being thorough enough to reasonably exclude scary diagnoses takes a few minutes. No one thanks a GP for missing something, and in reality, you are taught as a trainee that that you will in fact miss things - medicine is an art as much as it a science. However, GPs are expected to be instantaneous and yet flawless. It's impossible.





On a typical day I will see up to 30 patients in 10 minute appointments. I built extra time into my clinic as I just can't manage 10 minutes anymore... this time is my own and isn't paid any extra, but it allows me to breathe, and more importantly, to sometimes spend 2 or 3 valuable minutes extra with someone.
That's 5 hours of direct contact a day. 
I'll then speak to at least 6 patients in telephone appointments, which are usually follow up appointments of people I have already seen, typically taking about 45 minutes.
I'll usually visit 2 patients, taking about an hour. If someone is dying, the administration required to ensure good quality care is in place can easily take 2 hours to arrange. If someone needs admission to hospital, I can spend 45 minutes on the phone trying to organise the hospital and transport there.

On a typical day I also review about 40 blood, laboratory or x-ray results. On a good day, I might just need to file them, but potentially all 40 might require me to create an electronic task to an administrator, perhaps to arrange an urgent or routine appointment, a repeat test or a prescription. This takes about 30 minutes, but I can often do these 1 or 2 at a time as patients I'm seeing walk down the corridor.
In addition to blood tests, patients requesting their repeat medication need these arranging. I will look at around 50 prescriptions a day. This takes time, as I need to check that the medications are safe, that any necessary monitoring or reviews have been arranged, and there are often notes from patients asking for additional medications, each of which needs individually checking and prescribing. As a prescriber, I'm legally responsible if something bad happens and no one will take into account that I was busy or the patient was demanding a medication that I thought unsafe.

After tests and medications, I then read around 50 letters a day. These range from outpatient appointment letters, letters to request medication, letters detailing a patients hospital inpatient stay or anything really. I have to be good at scan-reading to find details... often there is vital information buried in a letter that I need to act on, such as a medication dose change or a referral request.


Some days I will also be "on call" or the "duty doctor". This means that in addition to the above, I need to deal with all queries patients make. This means every phone call where someone wants to discuss something, patients turning up asking for emergency appointments or prescriptions or other health professionals asking us to do something. People are often surprised that we can't "have a quick chat" or "do a quick prescription" at the drop of a hat, because they don't see what's happening behind the clinic room door.

Once the daily tasks are complete, I need to do the referral letters. This can take a surprising amount of time as many departments insist on us completing their own particular forms.

It's worth noting that this work takes between 10-12 hours per day, which is why many GPs appear to be "part-time" - in 3 days a GP can have worked a standard working week.

And lastly is the administration of a practice. The Department of Health, the Care Quality Commission and other agencies require practices to produce reports and data to ensure we are doing our job well. A large chunk of GP pay comes from managing long term conditions to targets, which is why GPs want patients to have blood tests "again" or to see them and review their conditions. 
There are often local initiatives too, such as trying to see older vulnerable people to put anticipatory care plans in place. These need time to arrange.


GP practices are usually private businesses, whom the NHS contacts out to do certain tasks. In the past GPs would often do extra, unfunded work simply because they enjoyed it. We don't have time for those luxuries anymore. As the funding for general practice stays static but the needs increase, it can be hard to keep the business afloat. I've heard it said that GPs could simply be paid less, but this seems unfair, especially when more and more work is being moved from hospitals to GPs with no change in the funding proportions. And frankly, if I'm going to give up large parts of my life to be a GP, it has to be worth it. No other profession is expected to work for free, and given the hours and responsibility we take, I don't think it's unreasonable to earn the same as a say a plumber or a solicitor.

The responsibility we shoulder is undescribable. Everyone, from other doctors, nurses and clinics, to parents, social workers and the media thinks GPs should do more, be more available, make fewer errors and detect more cancers whilst simultaneously not over prescribing, wasting resources or keeping people waiting. 

At the end of a day, I am usually burnt out with decision fatigue and a desire to take no responsibility for anyone or anything. Choosing what to have for my tea can sometimes be a bridge too far!

Today, a Friday, my 3 colleagues and I saw multiple additional and complicated patients all afternoon, in numbers and complexity way above normal. We left work several hours after the last scheduled appointment, because seeing patients who say that they are emergencies comes first. I haven't done my correspondence reading or all the prescription requests for today because I was asked to visit two patients late in the afternoon. We don't really have capacity for these, so I have to do after I've finished work. 
Both were older people, and one the result of the local hospital deciding to send someone home without adequate arrangements in place, meaning I had to sort it. I spent just under 2 hours in total on the telephone or visiting to manage this patient, but ultimately, by doing my job well, I managed to cover up the failings of others. I won't get, nor do I expect praise for simply doing what the public expects. Holding the lady's hand and reassuring her as she closed her eyes in bed after a long day is a privilege I'm afforded and don't take lightly. I am allowed into the hardest bits of peoples lives and I'm grateful to those who put their trust in me. I think most people want to feel needed and useful, and I'm lucky to have the opportunity to be in the position to help.



I keep a thank you card with me that a young patient made for me because I took time to explain her eczema to her. This took longer than 10 minutes, and in the grand scheme of things I'm pleased, because I hope to empower that little girl to be a teenager and then a woman who looks after herself. It would have been far quicker for me to just prescribe something and send her on her way to figure out herself. But I didn't. That small token is why I do the job, for a sense that I can make a difference. And so, whilst on a performance management level, it made the next patient late and irritated, I tell myself that it's worth it. 


Without these fleeting moments of gratitude, I don't know that I could go on.

Monday, 11 January 2016

Junior Doctor's Strike - Mythbuster

Apologies if you've read a zillion of these.

If you're a junior doctor - you probably already know this, but consider sharing.
If you're a member of the public - this might be for you.

Background
From 0800 on Tuesday 12th January 2016 until 0800 on Wednesday 13th January 2016, NHS-employed junior doctors will strike.
Depending on who you ask, and what you read, will differ in what you think the strikes are about.

The British Medical Association (BMA) is the doctor's union. It is non-political - that is it does not support any particular colour of government - and reflects the views of its members.
They say:
"In December 2015, the BMA suspended the industrial action and the government suspended their plans to impose a new contract, so that we could negotiate. Unfortunately we have been unable to reach agreement on some major points in sufficient time. Therefore despite our best efforts we cannot agree to a new contract and must lift the suspension of the industrial action. "

MYTH 1: HOSPITALS and GP SURGERIES REMAIN OPEN AS USUAL
Despite constant rhetoric from our Government that gives the impression patients will be left with no service, in tomorrow's strike, and the one that will follow, the NHS will look pretty much like it does on any weekend day or night. YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SEE A DOCTOR IF YOU NEED TO.
Jeremy Hunt has deliberately misled the media and public by stating:
"...patients will be put at risk because doctors are "basically saying 'we won't be there for you in life-threatening situations'." "
This is nothing more than an outright lie - the BMA and doctors themselves have worked to ensure that any strike action does not risk the lives of emergency patients.
Manchester Evening News: Junior doctors strike: what to do if you're ill and everything else you need to know 
The Telegraph: Jeremy Hunt warns junior doctors strike will harm patients

MYTH 2: DOCTORS ARE RISKING PATIENTS' LIVES BY STRIKING
Nope. Research suggests that actually you are safer on the day of a strike. That's probably due to a few factors. Elective work (that is, anything scheduled in advance, such as some outpatient surgeries or clinics) doesn't take place (so hospitals are less busy, allowing focus on emergencies) and doctors must make sure that arrangements are safe to be both morally and legally able to strike.
Jeremy Hunt has deliberately misled the media and public by stating:
"We will do everything we can to keep every A and E department open but junior doctors are the backbone and that will depend on finding consultants who can step in."
This is nothing more than an attempt to mislead. If he had bothered to read the easily available BMA guidance to doctors, he would see that doctors who participate in solely emergency work (like A&E) will have more limited availability to strike:
The planned model of strike action with emergency cover would not apply in my speciality, as nearly all of my work is emergency. What action can I take?
For doctors working in some specialities, such as emergency medicine, your ability to participate directly will be more restricted and you may not be able to participate at all in the emergency care only model of action.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/11/151125233018.htm
BMA: Industrial Action FAQs

MYTH 3: DOCTORS ARE JUST PROTESTING ABOUT PAY
Not true. It would be easier to just believe that, but its more complex. Is there anyone who isn't used to Governments using confusing numbers to mask the truth.
Doctors look very likely to face a pay cut as a result of the reforms suggested. Far from whinging about not getting enough, doctors (and other NHS staff, and the average UK salary) have seen their pay diminish in real terms as it hasn't increased with inflation since 2008. The graph below shows that (as well as MPs pay, which somehow has bucked the trend and accelerated way beyond inflation-rate rises. Doctors working now are earning 10-15% less than they would have done 8 years ago - no-one has moaned about this. They've taken it on the chin, for the good of the NHS.
The latest reforms look to alter how doctor's pay is calculated and so whilst the Government are quite happy to shout about the "11% rise in basic pay" they aren't so vocal about the fact that the plan to reduce the proportion of pay calculated from the number of anti-social hours means most doctors look to receive a real-term pay cut.
 So let's be clear, when Jeremy Hunt has deliberately misled the media and public by stating:
"We want to bring down weekend pay rates and make up for it with an increase in basic pay of around 11 per cent."
This does not mean a pay rise for doctors. It means a reshuffling of pay that will make it much easier to pay less to doctors doing the same work as they do now. 

MYTH 4: WHY SHOULDN'T DOCTORS WORK WEEKENDS?
They do already. Emergency care always has been 24/7/365 in the NHS. That doesn't mean you can bob down to your local hospital when you feel like it for a routine test - which is what Jeremy deliberately misleads at every opportunity about. If we, as a UK population, decide we want our NHS to work more like Tesco and be open more for routine work, we have to accept that it will cost more. Perhaps some members of the public feel doctors should work for free in order to provide this, but there are few, if any professions, where this would be acceptable. 
We could all pay more tax to fund routine work on a 24/7 basis.  Keeping the NHS as a "everyday-emergency and weekday-routine" model keeps it from costing more, when there is little evidence that suggests people genuinely want to pay more for this increased pseudo-convenience (You'd have to accept that your outpatient appointment might now be at 10pm on a Sunday night) 
Jeremy Hunt deliberately misleads the media and public by stating:
"'We have a situation where every weekend in the NHS we have lapses in care, that we are not able to promise NHS patients the same high-quality care every day of the week. And you can't choose which day of the week you get ill on."
You can in fact promise the same emergency care 24/7/365. Which is why junior doctors don't want to muck about with the emergency rota in order to allow more elective work at weekends. Unless Jeremy is planning on bringing in new staff, or working the current staff more, there is simply no logical explanation for how he plans to increase staffing.
Junior doctors are prepared to work more weekends, but not for free/slave labour, not as extra hours, and not at the cost of affecting care on weekdays.

MYTH 5: MORE DOCTORS MEANS BETTER HEALTHCARE
This is easier to bust. There is no point having more doctors without all the other staff that support patients in too. We haven't heard yet how Jeremy plans to do this - will nurses, porters, radiographers, pharmacists, physiotherapists, social workers, canteen staff, public transport staff, midwives, health visitors, operating department practitioners, cleaners and the rest also be asked to work more evenings and weekends for the same money?
This plan just isn't thought through, unless the goal isn't really for patients' benefit, but simply to cut doctor's wages and make it seem like they are whinging about nothing.

If after reading this, you still think 98% of junior doctors might just be having the population of England on, and trying to fleece them, whilst Jeremy Hunt nobly tries to stop them ask yourself just one question:

Who do you think is more likely to be lying? 

#juniordoctors
#juniorcontract
#BMA

BMA FAQs: http://www.bma.org.uk/iafaq
Twitter: @TheBMA

Wednesday, 13 May 2015

Eurovision 2015 Finalists


OK, so we've waded through the semi-finals together, but there's still more.
Several countries progress straight to the final - these are the so-called "Big Five" contributors to the Eurovision budget, plus the host, and for this year only*, Australia, who have been invited as a special guest to participate in this 60th Eurovision Song Contest.

(*if they win, and odds suggest this is quite possible, then they will co-host next year with another European country, so there will be no Sydney 2016).

So... who are these Final 7?

Australia

I'm led to believe Oz is all excited about this opportunity, and whilst names like Kylie were bandied about for a bit, they've gone for Australian Idol Guy Sebastian (whose name I thoroughly approve of) with this anthemic song that makes its message clear: WE WANT TO COME BACK. Forget geography, this song is a refreshing change of pace that channels Bruno Mars and stands out. Perhaps that's why its being courted as a potential winner...

Genre of music:  Funk-Jazz
How much of this can I remember? The chorus stays with you and you want to dance along
Better than last year's entry? It's their best ever... (no really, it is)
Best lyric: "Let's do tonight again"
Current reviews: "
The track is bouncy and warm with lashings of smooth brass and an addictive "woah-ooh-ooh" refrain that will have Europeans waving their flags." (DigitalSpy)
Will I be listening to this in a year? Hell yes!
Anyone fanciable? He's my kinda Guy (*groans*)


Arbitrary Eurovision style score:  10
 

Italy

This is also being touted as a potential winner and I've been trying to like it. The fact I can't suggests it will do well (I often back the losers!), but it's great to have a song in a non-English language do well. The trio sing their vaguely operatic song to a video recreating famous love scenes from films like... er Back to the Future? Anyway, they're easy on the eye with voices like syrup, and this will sound great in the arena for sure.

Genre of music: Popera
How much of this can I remember? "Grand-ay amorrrrrr-ray!"
Better than last year's entry? I prefer last year's song La Mia Citta.
Best lyric: "Tu sei il mio unico grande amore.../You’re my unique great love…"
Current reviews: "
Grande Amore has the same classy, dramatic orchestral arrangement while benefitting from layer-upon-layer of spine-tingling moments. The lads even make the low-key moments dramatic!" (ESCtips)
Will I be listening to this in a year? Not for me
Anyone fanciable? Here they are. They are definitely Italian.


Arbitrary Eurovision style score:   8


Austria

So the hosts are up next and how do you follow bearded lady extraordinaire Conchita. Apparently with three bearded men. The Makemakes sing this mid-tempo song that doesn't capture the glory of its predecessor, and sets the tone of the melancholic theme of the year; although the lyrics are fairly positive the tone isn't
Genre of music: Blues
How much of this can I remember? It's not a stand out
Better than last year's entry? Obv not
Best lyric: "You’re a lesson that I love learning, So any time that you’ve got a yearning"
Current reviews: "
The piano-led track broods into a swaying soft-rock number that hears Dodo's vocals crackle in just the right places." (DigitalSpy)
Will I be listening to this in a year? Nope.
Anyone fanciable? Hmm, if I'm in the right mood and they're in the right light...

Arbitrary Eurovision style score:   5


Spain

Spain made a really big deal about their selection of popular singer (and girlfriend of Manchester United goalie David de Gea). She sings about the "Dawn" and features as a fierce tigress in her promo video. Spanish sounds great in powerful songs like this, and she's proved her ability to command the stage with this. It's one of the better power ballads this year

Genre of music: Pop
How much of this can I remember? You'll all be "
EEEieEEO"-ing before the end.
Better than last year's entry? It's hard to choose between this and magnificent Ruth Lorenzo.
Best lyric: "Mi corazón, Me susurró, A mí no vuelvas sin su amor/My heart, He whispered, To me do not come back without your love"
Current reviews: "
Amanecer is a dramatic 3-minutes, but it’s difficult to isolate a particular passage that stands out and leaves a lasting impression." (ESCtips)
Will I be listening to this in a year? Yes!
Anyone fanciable? Edurne is front runner to win the unofficial Eurovision Top Model crown, and her man ain't bad either. What beautiful babies they'll have...


Arbitrary Eurovision style score:   10


France

France obligingly enter year on year, although often with a sense that their heart isn't in it, even more lackadaisical than the UK in their choice of entry. Lisa, however, sings quite a poignant war-related song that resonates even if you don't parle Français. It won't win, and may not trouble the top of the scoreboard, but perhaps it should, as more than any other song, it embodies the very reason Eurovision started 60 years ago. Bonne chance a la France.

Genre of music: Power ballad
How much of this can I remember? I actually realise I know more than I think every time I listen
Better than last year's entry? It's a better quality entry than TwinTwin but not quite as fun.

Best lyric: "Je ne suis qu'une blessure
Un cœur sans armure/I am but a wound, A heart without an armour"

Current reviews: "N'oubliez pas is an honourable ode to the men and women who served in past wars. It's a delicate track that hits a deep resonance with Eurovision's 60th anniversary, considering the competition was created to reunite a war-torn continent." (Digital Spy) Will I be listening to this in a year? I think I will actually
Anyone fanciable? Her stylist does a good job.

Arbitrary Eurovision style score:  8 

Germany

Awkward. Ann Sophie is representing germany after the entrant selected by the public turned down the chance in a live show after he "won". No matter, this song borrows from Germany's most recent winner Lena to sing a pop song with quirk. yet again, it borrows from this year's unoffical brief that songs be about difficult break-ups/misery/melancholia, though manages to be upbeat for the most part.

Genre of music: Soul-pop
How much of this can I remember? I could step in for one of the backing singers.
Better than last year's entry? This is better than too-quirky Elaiza.
Best lyric: "And when you call me baby, what's that supposed to mean
I don't know who you are, how long can we pretend"

Current reviews: "
Co-written by English chart topper Ella Eyre, “Black Smoke” would have been the perfect UK entry for the likes of Duffy or The Noisettes. Britain’s loss is Germany’s gain. After last year’s misfire, the land of Lena has upped its game with this sassy stomper of a tune. Retro without feeling dated, it injects some much needed attitude into the 2015 contest. " (Wiwibloggs) Will I be listening to this in a year? I won't skip it... but I won;t skip to it either.
Anyone fanciable? meh

Arbitrary Eurovision style score:  5


United Kingdom 

Lastly, its our own entry. This was trumpted to a big fanfare... joke. It was revealed hidden on BBC Red Button. I think someone realised that this wasn;'t the amazing idea they thought it was and decided to hide it away. To be fair, it is original, in a style not seen before and does manage to be very British, evoking the Charleston with some fun lyrics and even some scat singing.

The performers are competent, but Electro Velvet are unlikely to last beyond Vienna, having been packaged for this event. When will the UK look at what the rest of the entrants do and start picking from great existing acts, whether upcoming or established?

Depending on how many ballads of melancholy sandwich this entry in the running order will largely determine how it does - if positioned well it will be remembered as the fun entry that stopped you slitting your wrists. Lets keep our fingers crossed.

Genre of music: Electroswing (no, really this is a thing apparently)
How much of this can I remember? It's an earworm alright, but leaves an aftertaste you can't decide if you like.
Better than last year's entry? No. Molly was a good departure from the OAPs of UK, this feels a step back.

Best lyric: "Don’t go out in the pouring rain, You might get wet I’d be upset"
Current reviews: "
It’s an interesting, postmodern approach to Charleston and the melody is fun and catchy, but the uneven delivery and the ridiculous lyrics are off-putting. Moreover, the chemistry between the two singers is wanting. " (Wiwibloggs)Will I be listening to this in a year? Probably yes
Anyone fanciable? Judge for yourself


Arbitrary Eurovision style score:  6

Reviews

Digital Spy
Wiwibloggs
ESCtips

Ok, so there we go, all the entries reviewed. So which are my favourites? It's hard for me to order, but my play counts suggest the following top 10:
  1. Slovenia (of course)
  2. Sweden
  3. Latvia
  4. Armenia
  5. Azerbaijan
  6. Belgium
  7. Romania
  8. Spain
  9. Serbia
  10. Belarus 
 
Let's see what happens in Vienna, see you there? 

Thursday, 7 March 2013

UK throws it's Eurovision oar in for 2013

Okay, so, here is the United Kingdom's entry for the 2013 Eurovision Song Contest. It's called "Believe in Me" and it's by Bonnie Tyler - yes her off the 80s classics "Total Eclipse of the Heart"/ "Holding Out for a Hero". Not, as reported by the ever happy to dish up whatever misheard rumours they can Daily Fail suggested earlier in the week, Bonnie Langford!

For the second year in a row the BBC have selected the artist and song representing the UK. The majority of countries in Europe hold some sort of event to select their entries, ranging from the bigger-than-Eurovision-itself Melodifestivalen in Sweden to the bizarre vote-for-whoever-cos-we'll-change-it-if-we-want Belarus. The BBC had a go with that, but followed up the magnificent Jade Ewen (singing Andrew Lloyd Webber's "My Time" - watch the YouTube clip at 1:06 for the amazing violin bashing she gets) with the letdown of Josh Dubovie ("That Sounds Good To..." well no-one really), and so went on the pre-selection scavenge therafter, with the mixed results of boyband Blue and last year's Englebert Humperdink.

And herein lies our first problem. Bonnie is not a bad singer or artist, but she doesn't feel particularly current; her last non-compilation album release was in 2005. But she is releasing one this year, and so because the UK populace and BBC still see Eurovision as a bit of a joke, she gains publicity without risking losing anything. If only we had the balls to send our greatest acts like Russia or Sweden do, we might do a bit better... but that's a debate for someone else.

Let's take a look at the video shall we?


00:02 - Ok, so it's gonna be a ballad
00:08 - Is this an IKEA showroom?
00:15 - Nice quasi-rhyming! "And you laugh at thought of putting your faith in stuff... like love"
00:30 - Still no face-on shot and lots of cameras poking round corners - but it's already clear that she's had more than just a good make-up artist.
00:50 - And the chorus hits - I am already doing the "fist-grab" move like a backing singer
01:10 - I am liking these lyrics: "The way I speak the truth; I'll never lie to you"
01:34 - Now I get why no head-on shots; dead behind the eyes
01:40 - God this beach is depressing
01:51 - Hands in the air moment - I can already hear the G-A-Y remix kicking in at this point
02:01 - Those lip fillers are weird right?
02:16 - She actually looks a little drunk now as hit a middle 8 section
02:25 - Suddenly lots of cuts, either she fell over or we're building to that chorus...
02:30 - And here we are. I'm singing along... "Believe in Meeeeeeeeee-yeah-eh"...
02:40 - ...*eyes closed, fist-grab aplenty, wind machine* "The way I speak the truth; I'll never lie to you"
02:56 - Oh its over, was waiting for a bigger finish.

Well, that 3 minutes went quicker than I thought. Initial impressions - quite cute but probably not a show stopper... or a winner. But now I think about it, perhaps it will do better than it seems - a lot of entries this year are uptempo, dance-music infused given Loreen's Euphoria last year. If Bonnie is scheduled in between some of those, they annihilate the audience with some killer staging, and her croaky voice does that powerful-yet-vulnerable thing, this might translate well.

I'm gonna listen again now...

"Believe in Meeeeeeeeeeeeee, yeah-hee-yeah-eh"

I'm sold.

See you in Malmo Bonnie!



Saturday, 30 April 2011

The “urban” (i.e. has a rap bit in it)

Ok so next up are the entries that are, or at least try be at the 'cooler' end of the Eurovision spectrum. Only some succeed, and thankfully, and perhaps unbelievably, the UK entry seems to be one of them!

United Kingdom – "I Can" – Blue


So this year, the BBC have taken the brave decision to send Blue to Europe. You know, like a “real” band. One of my ongoing gripes with those that diss the UK not winning Eurovision is that they don’t realise how other countries genuinely try and send their best where as we dredge up old X-factor losers. So in a sense, I’m pleased, though the trouble with Blue is that they were popular in the late 90s and I’m not certain we’re ready for a revival. The song is damn catchy though, and we know they can sing quite well, so a low score would begrudgingly convince me the voting really is ALL political.
Having seen the lads do a few live performances now, they seem slick and at ease, so we really do have a hope at winning this year. Come on, all together, #“I can, I will...”#

Latvia/Latvija – "Angel in disguise" – Musiqq

[from http://www.eurovision.tv/page/history/year/participant-profile/?song=26113]

Quite a good sounding guitar “buddy-ballad” until you pay attention to the lyrics – “love me with luscious thighs”, which make this a bit less innocent and earnest than I imagine it was planned to be. It’s catchy though and very listenable, though the rap in the middle is just naff.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/eurovision/songs/2011/latvia.shtml

Georgia/საქართველო – "One More Day" - Eldrine


This starts off with some electronica, has a rocky chorus, throws in a rap and a weird video that’s like a behind-the-scene mixed in with the actual filming. Like it though, and hope the megaphones make it to the stage.

Greece/Ελλάδα – "Watch My Dance" – Loucas Yiorkas feat. Stereo Mike

This rap heavy song is pretty brave given that few across Europe will understand the lyrics. The singing bits are okay, and the laika music that is mandatory for all Greek/Cypriot entries twiddles on in the background, but this song never feels like it gets going.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/eurovision/songs/2011/greece.shtml